Ophtheirus salmonis) and in whole-body louse homogenate. J Parasitol 2000, 86(6):1199?205. Jones SRM: The occurrence and mechanisms of innate immunity against parasites in fish. Dev Comp Immunol 2001, 25(8?):841?52. Jones SRM, Fast MD, Johnson SC, Groman DB: Differential rejection of salmon lice by pink and chum salmon: disease consequences and expression of proinflammatory genes. Dis Aquat Organ
Ne expression analyses of immune responses in Atlantic salmon during early stages of infection by salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) revealed bi-phasic responses coinciding with the copepod-chalimus transition. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:141.Sutherland et al. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:200 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/Page 16 of25. Rolff J, Siva-Jothy MT: Invertebrate ecological immunology.
Stocks. Aquaculture 2004, 232(1?):41?2. 31. Gjerde B, Odegard J, Thorland I: Estimates of genetic variation in the susceptibility of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis. Aquaculture 2011, 314(1?):66?2. 32. Jones CS, Lockyer AE, Verspoor E, Secombes CJ, Noble LR: Towards selective breeding of Atlantic salmon for sea louse resistance: approaches to identify trai
N Salmo salar and coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch to experimental infection with sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis. Dis Aquat Organ 2002, 52(1):57?8. 47. Mordue AJ, Birkett MA: A review of host finding behaviour in the parasitic sea louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Caligidae: Copepoda). J Fish Dis 2009, 32(1):3?3. 48. Bj n PA, Finstad B: The physiological effects of salmon lice infection on sea tro
Et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/public
Cal replicates were found to be within 0.5 Ct for all samples. The interplate calibrator used to compare across plates within a gene had a
G the tendency of protein changes, larvae and pupae aged days 1, 3, and 5, respectively, were sampled for the analysis.Protein extraction and Two-dimensional Gel electrophoresis (2-DE)volume. One image was selected automatically as the reference gel to do gel analysis. All gels were matched in an automatic mode and further manual editing was done to correct the mismatched and unmatched spots. The