Irus salmonis secretory/excretory products and their effects on Atlantic salmon immune gene regulation. Parasite Immunol 2007, 29(4):179?89. Fast MD, Muise DM, Easy RE, Ross NW, Johnson SC: The effects of Lepeophtheirus salmonis infections on the stress response and immunological status of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Fish Shellfish Immunol 2006, 21(3):228?41. Fast MD, Ross NW, Johnson SC: Prost
Irus salmonis secretory/excretory products and their effects on Atlantic salmon immune gene regulation. Parasite Immunol 2007, 29(4):179?89. Fast MD, Muise DM, Easy RE, Ross NW, Johnson SC: The effects of Lepeophtheirus salmonis infections on the stress response and immunological status of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Fish Shellfish Immunol 2006, 21(3):228?41. Fast MD, Ross NW, Johnson SC: Prost
Esponse of naive Atlantic, chinook and coho salmon to experimental infection with Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae). Dis Aquat Organ 1992, 14(3):179?93. Krasnov A, Skugor S, Todorcevic M, Glover KA, Nilsen F: Gene expression in Atlantic salmon skin in response to infection with the parasitic copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis, cortisol implant, and their combination. BMC Genomics 2012, 13
Esponse of naive Atlantic, chinook and coho salmon to experimental infection with Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae). Dis Aquat Organ 1992, 14(3):179?93. Krasnov A, Skugor S, Todorcevic M, Glover KA, Nilsen F: Gene expression in Atlantic salmon skin in response to infection with the parasitic copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis, cortisol implant, and their combination. BMC Genomics 2012, 13
Sion analysis. Here all species were normalized together, and probes used only if they passed quality control in all species (Agilent). Enrichment analysis of up- or down-regulated gene lists was performed using Entrez-ID identifiers imported into the DAVID bioinformatics platform [78] using a background list specific to each species (all entities passing quality control filter for each experiment
Scribed previously [72]. In Trial 2, 15 individuals of each species (approx. 40-70 g) were randomly allocated to 4 tanks. A total of 7,335 copepodids (163/fish) were added to each of two tanks as described above. In Trial 3, 12?5 individuals of each species (approx. 50-80 g) were randomly allocated to each of four tanks. A total of 8,900 copepodids (199/fish) were added to each of two tanks as des
D differentially expressed genes in the skin of chum salmon at 6 days post exposure involved in immunity, proliferation, and other functions. Antiviral genes are suppressed as is seen in the anteriorSutherland et al. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:200 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/Page 15 ofkidney of both Pacific salmon. Colors and formats are as described in Additional file 6: Figure S3. Addit
Ments on the manuscript and statistical discussion. Thanks to B Cox for assistance in primer testing. Thanks to anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. Author details 1 Centre for Biomedical Research, Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3N5, Canada. 2Aquatic Genomics Research Center, National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Fisheries Research Agency