Standard deviation) time from collection until being frozen in the laboratory for samples with no observed mould was 2.9 (3.0) days. In comparison for low level mould it was 4.9 (3.6) days (crude mean difference compared with no mould; 95 confidence interval (CI) = 1.7; 1.4 ?2.1 days), for medium level mould it was 7.4 (4.9) days (3.9; 3.4 ?4.3), and for high level mould 11.4 (10.7) days (7.1; 6.
Standard deviation) time from collection until being frozen in the laboratory for samples with no observed mould was 2.9 (3.0) days. In comparison for low level mould it was 4.9 (3.6) days (crude mean difference compared with no mould; 95 confidence interval (CI) = 1.7; 1.4 ?2.1 days), for medium level mould it was 7.4 (4.9) days (3.9; 3.4 ?4.3), and for high level mould 11.4 (10.7) days (7.1; 6.
Er or others), season specimen collected, and time from specimen collection to being frozen in the laboratory. Analyses were conducted using Stata statistical software v.11.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).however 10.9 of swabs were received more than 7-days after their collection.Excluded samples:For EHV1 extraction and inhibition testing, 42 (0.81 ) DNA extracts failed the EHV1 criteria.
Er or others), season specimen collected, and time from specimen collection to being frozen in the laboratory. Analyses were conducted using Stata statistical software v.11.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).however 10.9 of swabs were received more than 7-days after their collection.Excluded samples:For EHV1 extraction and inhibition testing, 42 (0.81 ) DNA extracts failed the EHV1 criteria.
Er or others), season specimen collected, and time from specimen collection to being frozen in the laboratory. Analyses were conducted using Stata statistical software v.11.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).however 10.9 of swabs were received more than 7-days after their collection.Excluded samples:For EHV1 extraction and inhibition testing, 42 (0.81 ) DNA extracts failed the EHV1 criteria.
Er or others), season specimen collected, and time from specimen collection to being frozen in the laboratory. Analyses were conducted using Stata statistical software v.11.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).however 10.9 of swabs were received more than 7-days after their collection.Excluded samples:For EHV1 extraction and inhibition testing, 42 (0.81 ) DNA extracts failed the EHV1 criteria.
Rtile range 2?) days;Of the remaining 3366 samples, there were 2718 (80.7 ) samples positive for ERV3 with PCR amplification Ct values ranging from 23?5 (median 36) cycles. Overall, ERV3 was not detected in 649 (19.2 ) samples. During the first 8-months of batching and screening conducted in the laboratory, the number of ERV3 negative samples ranged from 11 to 25 in each 92 extraction run with a m
Rtile range 2?) days;Of the remaining 3366 samples, there were 2718 (80.7 ) samples positive for ERV3 with PCR amplification Ct values ranging from 23?5 (median 36) cycles. Overall, ERV3 was not detected in 649 (19.2 ) samples. During the first 8-months of batching and screening conducted in the laboratory, the number of ERV3 negative samples ranged from 11 to 25 in each 92 extraction run with a m